The Doctor Is In(filtrating)
This is just to make the pain go away.
The recent British car-bombing plot brought in its wake a stunning revelation - accurately speaking, more of a re-revelation in that even intellectual, well-bred (negating the 'wallowing in poverty, thereby being discriminated against and turning to extremism' theory, according to the subscribed view of the Left) members of the community are susceptible to being indoctrinated - that doctors are among the perpetrators. Naturally, regular readers should be familiar that Islam as an ideology permeates every stratum of society in sharia-ruled Muslim territories, and that automatically transcends typical demographics as well as class distinctions, leading one to the natural conclusion that professions are not invulnerable to ideological influence.
American Thinker has an article about jihad terror and 'healing':The fulminant recrudescence of jihadism during the latter half of the 20th century through the present, has been accompanied by a grotesque distortion of Osler's vision: a burgeoning cadre of Muslim physicians -- epitomized by those linked to the recent London and Glasgow terror plots -- lacking the most basic professional and personal ethics, have adopted a warped credo, albeit consistent with the doctrine of jihad war, which has been aptly characterized as "terror is healing".
Apart from the very disturbing consistency that many of these prominent jihadists happen to serve the medical profession - which, as I last checked, was still involved in saving lives rather than handing them over to the Reaper on a silver platter - the crucial observation that should be made is that our nemesis is far more surreptitious and audacious than we have perceived them to be. By this, I'm not even referring to the apologists and delusional appeasers of the Left, who have more or less signed up for membership of the International Caliphate, memorised Islamic doctrines while flushing the Constitution down the toilet bowl, and by defying reality have utterly and irrevocably failed to openly identify who our enemies are.
I guess it depends on what you deem constitutes as 'enemy', since transnational progressivism and jihad are symbiotic ideologies after all.
For those of us who are truly sane and unaffected by the malaise of the Left, here's the problem, and it's not necessarily unprecedented: it seems that jihadists who disguise themselves as innocuous, educated intellectuals in a profession as respected as that of the doctor, have discovered a breach in our defenses. Once went the argument - as aforementioned - that only Muslims mired in poverty and utter destitution, battered and tossed around by the processes of ghettoisation and discrimination, alienated from the mainstream and disenchanted with the promise of inclusiveness in the social community, would turn to the furthest fringes of Islam in spite of the 'collaborators' and 'stooges' belonging to the moderate Muslim spectrum. Thus, spurious links began forming between poverty and jihad. Having experienced the traumatic but 'inevitable' disenfranchisement from the exclusive 'evils' of capitalism and Western civilisation, these victims would be indoctrinated into the ranks of the next jihadist wave.
Which led to the suggestion that if we kept our ethnic minorities well-fed and happily integrated, Islamic ideology would cease to function since no vacuum of social well-being would exist. Would we have expected our fellow people to forget the lessons regarding appeasement so quickly after the tumultuous inter-war years of 1919-1938? Certainly, some would argue - there was much to forget about the complicity of Europeans in acquiescing with the systematic liquidation of their Jewish neighbours, acquaintances and friends; or collaboration with Nazi and/or Communist cadres in perpetuating atrocities against their own citizens in order to avoid being targeted for persecution themselves; or the naivete of Europeans in allowing themselves to be willingly deceived by Hitler as they sought to only hear what they wanted to hear: peace - at any price.
If there was one lesson we should have learnt about appeasement, it is that without recognising that our nemesis has no intention whatsoever to settle for anything less than complete submission to his will, any concession will whet his appetite and embolden him to pursue even more audacious objectives.
Tragically, that lesson has been unlearnt in Europe. Even in the face of irrefutable proof that the unthinkable had happened - educated products of Western tertiary institutions of higher learning had joined the jihadist cause - a significant fringe of the Left have refused to consider the possibility that infiltration of a very dangerous strain has manifested: the corruption of intellectual thought. Not only does this imply that potential jihadists and propagandists are already running rampant in universities and around intellectual circles - and therefore generating more apologists and sympathisers for what is perceived as a harmless ideology - but that it might not be far off in the future when dependence on these intellectuals to sustain the practice of medicine increasingly shifts towards a larger proportion of moderately wealthy Muslim middle-class.
And do not for a second think that this phenomenon is confined to the medical profession. Soon enough, any occupation could find itself relying more and more on this segment of the intellectual market: scientists, businessmen, teachers, professors, analysts, artists. Undoubtedly, this might sound like scare-mongering or even - horrors of horrors! - traces of Islamophobia, but the threat is potentially severe: infiltration of Islamist ideology through the medical channel has resulted in the problems that Egypt faces today:This first came to the attention of the world with the infiltration of Egyptian medical and related professional associations by the Muslim Brotherhood (MB), culminating in the 1990s. Doubtless the most infamous representative of this trend was the Egyptian second-in-command of al-Qa’eda, Dr Ayman al-Zawahiri — a physician from a family of doctors and pharmacists. But the MB also has immense influence among Palestinians through its offshoot, Hamas, as well as in Jordan and even in Iraq, where its front, the Iraq Islamic party, serves in the Baghdad government.
It would be an exaggeration to conclude that either of these terrorist offshoots would be able to provide cheap, accessible and consistently improving standards of health-care, research and development in medical innovation in such a manner that could compete or better our very own social services sector, privatised or nationalised. Yet if health-care increasingly becomes trickier to micro-manage and enforce, with costs that inevitably will rise as ageing populations become the central issue in developed economies, state budgets are bound to decline as the vicious cycle of loss of faith in state provision and consequent trimming of funds perpetuates and reinforces itself. Nationalisation of provision of health services will be perceived as inadequate, inefficient and unfavourable - calls for privatisation would naturally increase (again, accompanied by the abandonment of memory: people would somehow forget the disastrous consequences of privatising health-care). With these jihadists practising as private doctors offering their services, they may eventually succeed in fragmenting the dependency of the people on the state, simultaneously achieving infiltration into intellectual circles.
[...] Muslim Brotherhood literature such as the work of Sayyid Qutb (1906-66) propagates the view that Islam and science are inextricable from one another, and that a fundamentalist view of religion will lead to a revival of Muslim science, such as existed in the Islamic golden age, more than half a millennium ago. For this reason the MB now targets professionals.
Furthermore, the political success of the Egyptian Brotherhood, Hamas and Hezbollah is seen in some quarters as a product of their capacity to provide medical and other social services in countries where state budgets are grossly inadequate and corrupted. Islamists have been quick to understand this dynamic as a means to manipulate the masses.
Let's extrapolate into the future and imagine a scenario whereby the state authorities somehow wake up to the realisation of this gradual infiltration process: they order crackdowns, conducting investigations and purging the professions of these jihadist intellectuals from society. Perhaps it may already be too late when people realise that without the significant support of those less overt sympathisers and supporters of jihad in medical ranks, there may not be enough doctors to fill the clinics and ORs. Or that fresh graduates from medical school have already been dhimmified and conditioned to acquiesce in the intolerance of Islamist ideology, conceding increasing autonomy of decision-making to their jihadist colleagues, closet or otherwise.
This, as aforementioned, is not unprecedented. In the wake of 1945, de-Nazification was perceived to be foolish because the economies of Europe were being held up by businessmen, industrialists and workers who just happened to be Nazi Party supporters. Thus, governments sought to re-employ those whose Nazi credentials were less than obvious, or those who could be cleared of direct complicity in war crimes. Ex-Nazis had to keep their mouths shut to get re-employed into the workforce, but the concession was made to them nonetheless - this betrayed the 'clean break from the past' of Europeans from the atrocities of the Nazi regime, but in terms of economic recovery it was absolutely necessary. Ideological differences were overlooked in favour of attaining full employment - high unemployment was then widely believed to have been the main source of economic discontent that had precipitated both recent wars on the continent.
Even after the fall of the Soviet Union, ex-Communist satellite states did not possess the luxury of de-Sovietisation or purging and persecuting all Communist supporters; the peoples of Central and Eastern Europe tended to conveniently dismember the USSR's involvement and acquiescence in the fall of Communism from the history that they were willing to embrace: the resistance movements wanted to claim all the revolutionary credit for themselves, unwilling to share it with Gorbachev and supporters of perestroika in the USSR at that time. Thus, it became easier for those who were once Communist supporters to blend into post-Soviet society, provided that they were not prominent figures who could be clearly identified with the show trials of the Stalinist era, or collaborators with the Communist Party cadres.
In both cases, Nazi and Communist supporters were separately 'rehabilitated' back into society: economic necessity dictated such tolerance in the early post-war decades; the need to craft a myth of revolution for its own people and a conscious eschewing of social fragmentation should anti-Communist purges be carried out extensively dictated the second instance. Should society grow irreversibly dependent on these clandestine jihadist intellectual movements and circles, despite the purges of tomorrow we might be recruiting the same ideological fanatics and adherents back into the fold. After the physical destruction of the Third Reich, Facism became discredited among intellectual circles rather irreversibly, while Communism found itself in favour as an alternative. Following the events of 1956 and 1968, Communism was cynically discredited by its own adherents, and its fate was only hermetically sealed with the dissolution of the Soviet Union. No other ideology has attempted to fill the vacuum - until now.
Islamist ideology has not been discredited as Fascism or Communism, both which had endured and as a consequence become relegated to the furthest fringes of acceptable politics, thus it has and will continue to establish and reinforce a foothold in intellectual circles in the West. If we decide not to do anything substantial now, our struggle to discredit Islamist ideology will prove to be a slippery slope. 'Purge, rinse and repeat' will eventually become meaningless as we will be forced to choose superficial 'rehabilitation' of clandestine jihadist organisations and their intellectual Trojans for the sake of rescuing the last vestiges of our capitalist economies. This fate is, however, debatable and in no way inevitable - should we choose at that critical moment to favour survival above economic preservation, we might be able to take up arms and drive our nemesis out of our lands and into the depths of oblivion.
But that, as doctors say when unsure of the prospects of success, would be 'too close to call'.
What arms would we have access to when our military is subservient to jihadist generals?
The time to act is now.
Post-script: Gates of Vienna has a post regarding this.
Labels:
Islam
3 spoke up:
Dear brothers and sisters in Islam,
I have something terrible to report.
I have come home from the hospital feeling very upset. All the radiation sources have disappeared from the oncology department - probably those Buddhists up to their tricks again.
The kaffir hospital management (Inshallah may they soon die of strange, undiagnosable ailments and be replaced by Islamic brothers) called an emergency meeting addressed by a kaffir police officer.
This institutionally-racist representative of the oppressive Zionist-Crusader alliance said that the radiation sources could be "Used by terrorists to make a dirty bomb".
I was extremely hurt and distressed by this statement. I forcefully pointed out that there is no such thing as a terrorist. Gordon Brown himself (pbuh) has said so. The word 'terrorist' is hate-speech - it is a racist term of abuse used by bigots, Islamophobes and BNP supporters (Inshallah may they find themselves upon our operating tables tended by Muslim anaesthetists) to vilify peaceful Muslims.
I have written to Sir Ian B.Liar demanding the officer's dismissal and prosecution for racist verbal assault. I intend to sue the Metropolitan Police for the post-traumatic emotional stress this appalling incident has caused me, and will continue to cause me for the next fifty years. I have been examined by four independent Muslim psychiatrists who will vouch for my mental suffering (I'll accept an out of court settlement of £500,000 in a five-way split, Inshallah)
I just hope I've recovered enough by next week to be able to attend the annual dinner of the Muslim Medical Malpractitioners' Association. My colleague Dr Aggun I. Singh-Deth will be receiving the Dr Josef Mengele (pbuh) Prize for innovation in surgical procedures, and I am due to give a presentation on performance evaluation for our new Dr Harold Shipman (pbuh) Award for meeting mortality rate targets (One point for a standard kaffir, two for a dancing slag, three for a Jew, four for an Islamophobic blogger, five for an apostate and 100 for Sir Salman Rushdie).
I must finish now, as night has fallen and I have noticed a strange green light in the back of my car. Probably glowworms.
Dr C. Riyal Kilah
Muslim Medical Malpractitioners Association
'You'll need more than an apple a day to keep us away' TM
If you will please examine our constitution you will see that we are obliged to
2.1.4. To promote the preservation and protection of the good health of Muslims in the United Kingdom.
But there is no obligation to promote the preservation and protection of the good health of the filthy kuffar:
http://www.mdda.org.uk/web/constitution.php
- Dr Leeth Al-Dohs
Can I point you to something I wrote on this topic which complements what you've said?
Post a Comment